Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 9f519ebd authored by Ben Anderson's avatar Ben Anderson
Browse files

fixed to default to html in .Rmd otherwise bookdown features fail

parent 40026ec9
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
...@@ -4,8 +4,7 @@ makeReport <- function(f){ ...@@ -4,8 +4,7 @@ makeReport <- function(f){
params = list(title = title, params = list(title = title,
subtitle = subtitle, subtitle = subtitle,
authors = authors), authors = authors),
output_file = paste0(here::here("docs/"), f, ".html"), output_file = paste0(here::here("docs/"), f, ".html")
output_format = "html_document"
) )
# word # word
rmarkdown::render(input = paste0(here::here("2020-10-16-retrofOrBust", f), ".Rmd"), rmarkdown::render(input = paste0(here::here("2020-10-16-retrofOrBust", f), ".Rmd"),
......
...@@ -28,6 +28,11 @@ output: ...@@ -28,6 +28,11 @@ output:
bibliography: '`r path.expand("~/github/dataknut/refs/refs.bib")`' bibliography: '`r path.expand("~/github/dataknut/refs/refs.bib")`'
--- ---
<hr>
>This frdayFun note was first published as a [blog](https://dataknut.wordpress.com/2020/10/16/retrofit-or-bust/)
<hr>
```{r setup, include=FALSE} ```{r setup, include=FALSE}
knitr::opts_chunk$set(echo = TRUE) knitr::opts_chunk$set(echo = TRUE)
``` ```
...@@ -73,7 +78,8 @@ If we: ...@@ -73,7 +78,8 @@ If we:
…then if we invest ~£332bn we get a £22.5 – £10 = £12bn (55%) energy cost reduction (Figure 1 & Table 2 below). As you’d expect we see the biggest improvement costs and absolute savings in the bands with the most dwellings (C & D) but the biggest % savings in F & G. …then if we invest ~£332bn we get a £22.5 – £10 = £12bn (55%) energy cost reduction (Figure 1 & Table 2 below). As you’d expect we see the biggest improvement costs and absolute savings in the bands with the most dwellings (C & D) but the biggest % savings in F & G.
![Estimated current energy costs, post-improvement costs and % reduction for English dwellings](Fig1.png) ![Estimated current energy costs, post-improvement costs and % reduction for English dwellings](Fig1.png)
Figure 1: Estimated current energy costs, post-improvement costs and % reduction for English dwellings (EHS 2018, own calculations, see Table below for detail)
>Figure 1: Estimated current energy costs, post-improvement costs and % reduction for English dwellings (EHS 2018, own calculations, see Table below for detail)
Remember the £3.8bn [Social Housing Decarbonisation Fund](https://www.housing.org.uk/news-and-blogs/news/chancellors-statement-and-affordable-homes-programme/)? Well according to the EHS 2018 social housing is already leading the way with 56% of them in bands A-C compared to under 30% of owner-occupied. As a result if we ignore the A-Cs then we ‘only’ need to invest £24bn in social housing retrofits for the 1.79m D-G dwellings (see Table 3 below). If we include the A-Cs (the published tables don’t give a A/B/C breakdown) it’s a £54bn investment. On these numbers, £3.8bn a year for 10 years might see this sector home… Remember the £3.8bn [Social Housing Decarbonisation Fund](https://www.housing.org.uk/news-and-blogs/news/chancellors-statement-and-affordable-homes-programme/)? Well according to the EHS 2018 social housing is already leading the way with 56% of them in bands A-C compared to under 30% of owner-occupied. As a result if we ignore the A-Cs then we ‘only’ need to invest £24bn in social housing retrofits for the 1.79m D-G dwellings (see Table 3 below). If we include the A-Cs (the published tables don’t give a A/B/C breakdown) it’s a £54bn investment. On these numbers, £3.8bn a year for 10 years might see this sector home…
......
No preview for this file type
source diff could not be displayed: it is too large. Options to address this: view the blob.
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment