Commit c5136350 authored by Ben Anderson's avatar Ben Anderson
Browse files

updated processing script with *valid definitions

parent ac46edf1
......@@ -14,6 +14,23 @@
* Gcons<year>valid variable has undefined labels: G, L, M = ? Presumably 0 = off gas & V = valid?
* ideally DECC should set missing to -99 to aid re-coding and avoid unpleasant surprises in naive analysis!
the Gcons*valid variable codes:
G = Gas consumption invalid, greater than 50,000
L = Gas consumption invalid, less than 100
M = Gas consumption data is missing in source data
0 = Property does not have a gas connection
V = Valid gas consumption (between 100 and 50,000 inclusive)
NB - there are valid gas readings of '0' which presumably were > 100 but < 249 (first gas 'heap' = 'nearest 500')
the Econs*valid variable codes:
G Electricity consumption invalid, greater than 25,000 (DECC lookup table says 50,000)
L Electricity consumption invalid, less than 100
M Electricity consumption data is missing in source dataset
V Valid electricity consumption (between 100 and 25,000 inclusive)
/*
Copyright (C) 2014 University of Southampton
......@@ -85,7 +102,6 @@ if `create_codebook' {
log off main
log using "`dpath'/processed/codebook-NEED-EULF-2014-`version'-`sample'pc-$S_DATE.smcl", replace name(cb)
desc
di "** no idea what G, L, M mean in the 'valid' variables - presumably 0 = off gas & V = valid?"
codebook
log close cb
log on main
......@@ -157,7 +173,6 @@ if `create_xwavefile' {
log off main
log using "`dpath'/processed/codebook-NEED-EULF-2014-`ifile'_xwavefile-`version'-`samplet'-$S_DATE.smcl", replace name(cb_xwave)
desc
di "** no idea what G, L, M mean in the 'valid' variables - presumably 0 = off gas & V = valid?"
di "** urban/rural would be helpful"
codebook
compress
......
Supports Markdown
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment